Copying Strategies in People with Different Time Perspectives
https://doi.org/10.21603/2078-8975-2022-24-6-778-784
Abstract
The article defines the concepts of time perspective and vision of the future, as well as the relationship between them. A review of foreign and domestic publications revealed the main approaches to adversity, copying, and various classifications of protective behavior. The study involved 49 women and 35 men aged 24–54 y.o., who found themselves in a difficult life situation: all respondents had to leave their permanent place of residence because of a direct threat to their life and health. The empirical research used R. Lazarus’s methodology for diagnosing the copying strategies and F. Zymbardo’s time perspective method. The copying strategies appeared to correspond to different time perspectives. The respondents with a negative past fixation chose confrontation, social support, escape, and avoidance. The respondents with a positive past fixation preferred to plan their problem solutions. The respondents who focused on the present turned to social support and positive reassessment. Those focused on the future accepted their responsibility, planned their solutions, and were prone to positive reassessment. The results were statistically confirmed using the Mann-Whitney U-test. Time perspective proved to be an important intrapersonal resource in psychotherapeutic work with disadvantaged patients.
About the Author
E. Yu. Kolchik
Fevzi Yakubov Crimean Engineering and Pedagogical University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Elena Yu. Kolchik
Simferopol
References
1. Folkman S., Stein N. L. Adaptive goals processes in stressful events. Memory for everyday and emotional events, eds. Stein N. L., Ornstein P. A., Tversky B., Brainerd C. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1997, vol. 6, 113–137.
2. Lazarus R. S., Folkman S. Stress, appraisal and coping. NY: Springer, 1984, 456.
3. Nartova-Bochaver S. K. "Copying behavior" in the system of concepts of personality psychology. Psikhologicheskii Zhurnal, 1997, 18(5): 20–30. (In Russ.) EDN: RCTPBB
4. Khachaturova M. R. Coping repertoire of personality: a review. Psychology, Journal of the Higher School of Economics, 2013, 10(3): 160–169. (In Russ.) EDN: SHBGAH
5. Askarova G. Basic approaches to studying coping strategies in hard life situations. Scientific progress, 2021, 1(5): 308–316. (In Russ.)
6. Stanibula S. A. Bio-psycho-social model of coping behavior. Development of Personality, 2018, (1): 204–215. (In Russ.) EDN: XZRKRF
7. Krasicki J. Fighting for truth (Berdyayev, Kant and others). Solovyov Studies, 2014, (2): 108–125. (In Russ.) EDN: SHBUKN
8. Rubinshtein S. L. Fundamentals of general psychology. St. Petersburg: Piter, 2015, 713. (In Russ.) EDN: NKSAKP
9. Golovakha E. I., Kronik A. A. Psychological time of the personality. Kiev, Nauk. dumka, 1984, 207. (In Russ.)
10. Mihalski A. V. Psychology of the design of the future. Moscow: MSUPE, 2014, 192. (In Russ.) EDN: UJLYTB
11. Abulkhanova K. A. Time of personality and its vital way. Institut psikhologii Rossiiskoĭ akademii nauk. Chelovek i mir, 2017, 1(1): 165–200. (In Russ.) EDN: YTEAMP
12. Abulkhanova K. A., Berezina T. N. Personality time and time of life. St. Petersburg: Piter, 2001, 304. (In Russ.) EDN: QXOQGT
13. Levin K. Field theory in social sciences. St. Petersburg: Piter, 2000, 365. (In Russ.)
14. Zimbardo P. G., Boyd J. N. Putting time into perspective: A valid, reliable individual-differences metric. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1999, 77(6): 1271–1288. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.77.6.1271
15. Zimbardo P. G., Boyd J. N. The time paradox: the new psychology of time that will change your life. St. Petersburg: Rech, 2010, 349. (In Russ.) EDN: QXZLBN
16. Dreves P. A., Blackhart G. C. Thinking into the future: how a future time perspective improves self-control. Personality and Individual Differences. 2019, 149: 141–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2019.05.049
17. Kanavina S. S. Motivation and its reflextion in time perspective. Psikhologiia v ekonomike i upravlenii, 2017, 9(2): 74–81. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17150/2225-7845.2017.9(2).74-81
18. Abramov V. V. Personality time orientation as the factor of copingbehavior development. Teoreticheskaya i eksperimentalnaya psikhologiya, 2014, 7(1): 66–72. (In Russ.) EDN: RZLKPV
19. Nuttin J. Future time perspective and motivation. Moscow: Smysl, 2004, 607. (In Russ.)
20. Gatalskaia G. V., Dzhiganskaia K. N. The fhenomenology of experiences and the success of adaptation of forced migrants. Russian Psychological Journal, 2016, 13(3): 10–25. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21702/rpj.2016.3.1
21. Barysheva E. N. Psychological features of emotional experiencing of refugees from combat zone. Penzenskii psikhologicheskii vestnik, 2016, (1): 59–77. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17689/psy-2016.1.4
22. Belan E. A., Khudik V. A. Age- features of individual personal perception the difficult vital situations (on an example of research of adult people). Vestnik gosudarstvennogo universiteta imeni A. S. Pushkina, 2014, 5(3): 5–14. (In Russ.) EDN: TDVAKL
23. Elizarov S. G. Peculiarities of the future image of teenagers in hard life situation (gender aspect). Uchenye zapiski. Elektronnii nauchnyi zhurnal Kurskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 2021, (4): 634–640. (In Russ.) EDN: HPRXHV
24. Elizarov S. G., Narykova I. N., Orlova O. I. An adolescent in a difficult life situation: opportunities for post-rehabilitation. Bulletin of Psychological Practice in Education, 2019, (2): 68–74. (In Russ.) EDN: WTCJPS
25. Trofimova E. L., Geranyushkina G. P., Malakhaeva S. K. Features of the time perspective in adolescents with health disabilities. Baikal Research Journal, 2019, 10(4). (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17150/2411-6262.2019.10(4).6
Review
For citations:
Kolchik E.Yu. Copying Strategies in People with Different Time Perspectives. The Bulletin of Kemerovo State University. 2022;24(6):778-784. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21603/2078-8975-2022-24-6-778-784
Views:
303
Email this article 