Temporal Aspects of Lifestyle in the Kamchatka Territory
https://doi.org/10.21603/2078-8975-2022-24-4-446-453
Abstract
This article introduces lifestyle and temporality as subjective time that includes characteristics of all life activity processes. The research involved residents of the Kamchatka Territory in the Russian Far East. A regression analysis provided equations that revealed the common temporal specialties of time perspectives in conjunction with lifestyle. The parameter of the past in the time perspective structure lacked coordination and combined negative and positive characteristics. It reflected a certain predetermination in life path construction with a deficit of activity where the subjects would have to oppose themselves to the world and environment. The parameter of the present revealed hedonism and fatalism that blocked future life planning and a life predetermination forms (I cannot control my life). Hedonistic present and fatalistic present were essentially different. However, the equation analysis showed a common element in the lifestyle structure that connected hedonistic and fatalistic present and defined the vector of human life. In the present, respondents relied on their social contacts as a friendly resource, on compromise as a life strategy, and dependence of inner and outer parameters as an inevitability of the world. The Future appeared to be an unstable construct with predominating fatalism. The temporal specialties of lifestyle revealed inability to resist and oppose the world, which manifested itself in inflexibility and inability to change a preplanned set of action. Respondents organized their life space by following some instructions and relied on them to make their behavior rational and organize their life. Neurotic conflicts and lifestyle disharmony manifested themselves as polar and incompatible aspects of assessment and description.
About the Authors
A. A. Kulik
Vitus Bering Kamchatka State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky
A. V. Mazurkevich
Vitus Bering Kamchatka State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky
References
1. Nekrasova I. N. Way of life as konstrukt of system researches|work-up| in psychology. Science Vector of Togliatti State University. Series: Pedagogy, Psychology, 2013, (4): 127–129. (In Russ.)
2. Shterts O. M. The social-psychological analysis of the category "lifestyle". Kontcept, 2013, S1: 103–112. (In Russ.)
3. Serkin V. P. Professional specificity of the image of the world and way of life. Psikhologicheskii Zhurnal, 2012, 33(4): 78–90. (In Russ.)
4. Petrosyan S. N. Prospects for the study of person life scenario in line with the subject-being approach. Human. Community. Management, 2016, 17(2): 6–25. (In Russ.)
5. Grishina N. V. Life scripts: normativity and individualization. Psikhologicheskie Issledovaniya, 2011, (3). (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.54359/ps.v4i17.846
6. Smirnov S. D., Chumakova M. A., Kornilova T. V. The world image in dynamic control of uncertainty. Voprosy Psikhologii, 2016, (4): 3–13. (In Russ.)
7. Danenova D. B. Transformation of way of life and image of the world as a psychohistorical problem. Cand. Psychol. Sci. Diss. Karaganda, 2001, 189. (In Russ.)
8. Shunkova S. V. Specificity of the image of the world and a way of life of the geologist (professionals and students). Organizatinal psychology, 2012, 2(2): 22–33. (In Russ.)
9. Serkin V. P. Postponed life neurosis (PLN) and northern neurosis. Sci. Notes of the Department of Psychology of Southern International University. Magadan: Kordis, 2001, iss. 1, 113–118. (In Russ.)
10. Serkin V.P. The image of the world and the way of life. Magadan: Sev. mezhdunar. un-t, 2005, 331. (In Russ.)
11. Martyanova G. Yu. The study of correlation between time perspective and self-regulation in a difficult life situation. Psychologist, 2020, (1): 34–43. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25136/2409-8701.2020.1.32180
12. Zaytseva Yu. E. Time of meaning: narrative modus of time perspective. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Psychology and Education, 2018, 8(1): 16–33. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu16.2018.102
13. Bredun E. V., Krasnoryadtseva O. M., Shcheglova E. A. Typological features of the subjective perception of time in the context of a person's chronotopic life. Sibirskiy Psikhologicheskiy Zhurnal, 2018, (68): 32–45. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17223/17267080/68/2
14. Mazurkevich A. V., Yanitsky M. S., Seryy A. V. Temporal aspects of the transformation of value structure of self-identity in the context of fundamental changes in life situation. Vestnik Novosibirskogo Gosudarstvennogo Pedagogicheskogo Universiteta, 2017, 7(3): 104–122. (In Russ.) http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2226-3365.1703.07
15. Popova O. N. The problem of a person's time perspective balance. Sibirskiy Psikhologicheskiy Zhurnal, 2017, (66): 18–31. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17223/17267080/66/2
16. Nekrasova E.V. Spatio-temporal organization of the human's world of life. Barnaul, 2005, 319. (In Russ.)
17. Bredun E. V. Features of time estimation in a changing external tempo-rhythmic characteristics. Vestnik Altayskogo Gosudarstvennogo Pedagogicheskogo Universiteta, 2017, (2): 48–52. (In Russ.)
18. Bredun E. V. Typological features of the subjective perception of time: chronotopic context. Cand. Psychol. Sci. Dis. Abstract. Tomsk, 2018, 24. (In Russ.)
19. Martsinkovskaya T. D. Internal form of psychological hronotope: approaches to the problem. Psikhologicheskie Issledovaniya, 2017, 10(54). (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.54359/ps.v10i54.366
20. Popova O. N. Characteristics of the time perspective balance of the personality. Sibirskiy Psikhologicheskiy Zhurnal, 2018, (69): 85–99. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17223/17267080/69/5
21. Martirosyan K. V. Comparative analysis of the formal characteristics of temporal perspective in Russian and Armenian sample. Fundamental research, 2014, (12-7): 1571–1575. (In Russ.)
22. Knyazeva E. N., Kurdyumov S. P. Synergetics: non-linearity of time and landscapes of co-evolution. Moscow: KomKniga, 2011, 272. (In Russ.)
23. Lukyanov O. V. Time factor in the system of psychological interpretations. Psychology. Journal of the Higher School of Economics, 2010, 7(2): 46–63. (In Russ.)
24. Kulik A. A. Lifestyle of people living in harsh climatic and geographical conditions. Vestnik Kemerovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 2020, 22(1): 139–151. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21603/2078-8975-2020-22-1-139-151
25. Syrtsova A., Sokolova E. T., Mitina O. V. Adaptation of F. Zimbardo time perspective inventory. Psikhologicheskii Zhurnal, 2008, 29(3): 101–109. (In Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Kulik A.A., Mazurkevich A.V. Temporal Aspects of Lifestyle in the Kamchatka Territory. The Bulletin of Kemerovo State University. 2022;24(4):446-453. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21603/2078-8975-2022-24-4-446-453
Views:
271
Email this article 