Preview

SibScript

Advanced search

Electronic Literary Text in the Framework of Post-Structuralism Textology

https://doi.org/10.21603/2078-8975-2019-21-3-821-829

Abstract

The article features the phenomenon of electronic literary text. The research objective was to identify the structural and semantic features of electronic literary texts within the framework of post-structuralism. The electronic literary text resulted not only from the development of information technology: it is also the product of the development of philosophical and linguistics ideas of post-structuralism. The post-structuralism perspective was not repeated exactly on the technological level of the electronic text representation. However, the post-structuralist text theory was reflected in the electronic literary text structure, i.e. its rhizomatic, decentered, fragmentary, intertextual, and simulation character. In particular, the attempt to build cohesion of semiotically diverse components in the electronic environment reflects the post-structuralists idea of chaos and disorganization. The attempt to provide the navigation in this multi-component unity by the key-word hyperlinks reflects the idea of the total interconnectivity of all structural components, i.e. intertextuality. The phenomenon of intertextuality defines the culmination of decenterment and nomadism in the text theory. It is connected with the rhizomatic concept and hypertextuality. The research used electronic literary texts based on Adobe Flash and HTML. The research employed general scientific methods, such as monitoring and description, in conjunction with the method of comparative linguistic analysis. The author concludes that the text perception and electronic virtual world immersion become much more important than the artifacts in the electronic literature of XXI century. The electronic literary text became the poststructuralist concept of the new esthetic object, lost its integrity and composition stability, and opened itself to external input.

About the Author

S. A. Kuchina
Novosibirsk State Technical University
Russian Federation

20, K. Marx Ave., Novosibirsk, 630073



References

1. Barthes R. Selected Works. Semiotics. Poetics. Moscow: Progress, 1989, 616. (In Russ.)

2. Baudrillard J. Simulacrum and simulation. Moscow: POSTUM, 1989, 240. (In Russ.)

3. Deleuze J., Guattari F. Rhizome (A Thousand Plateaus, Chapter One). Almanakh "Vostok", 2005, (11/12). Available at: http://www.situation.ru/app/j_art_1023.htm (accessed 08.01.2019). (In Russ.)

4. Derrida J. Letter and distinction. Moscow: Akademicheskii proekt, 2000, 237. (In Russ.)

5. Kristeva Yu. Bakhtin, word, dialogue and novel. French semiotics: From structuralism to poststructuralism. Moscow: Progress, 2000, 427–457. (In Russ.)

6. Lyotard J.-F. The Post-Modern Condition. Saint-Petersburg: Aletheia, 1998, 201. (In Russ.)

7. Foucault M. The Order of Things: Archaeology of the Human Sciences. Moscow: Progress, 1977, 407. (In Russ.)

8. McLuhan M. The Gutenberg Galaxy: The Making of Typographic Man. Kiev: Nika-tsentr, Elga, izd. dom Dmitriia Burago, 2003, 206. Available at: http://yanko.lib.ru/books/media/mcluhan%3Dgalaktika_gutenberga.pdf (accessed 08.01.2019). (In Russ.)

9. Lutovinova O. V. Linguistic and cultural features of virtual discourse. Dr. Philol. Sci. Diss. Volgograd, 2009, 519. (In Russ.)

10. Nosov N. А. Virtual Reality. Voprosy filosofii, 1999, (10): 152–164. (In Russ.)

11. Chertov L. F. Virtual space of images. Virtual space of culture: Proc. Sci. Conf. Saint-Petersburg, April 11–13, 2000. SaintPetersburg: SPbFO, 2000, 53–55. (In Russ.)

12. Heim M. The Metaphysics of virtual reality. From naive realism to surrealism. Possible worlds and virtual reality, comps. Druk V. Ya., Rudnev V. P. Moscow, 1995, iss. I, 96–128. (In Russ.)

13. Dedova O. V. Linguistic concept of hypertext: main notions and terminological paradigm. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 9. Filologiya, 2001, (4): 22–36. (In Russ.)

14. Chernyavskaya V. E. Text in the medial space. Moscow: URSS, 2013, 232. (In Russ.)

15. Van Dijk T. A. Pragmatics of the text. New in foreign linguistics, 1978, vol. 8. Linguistic text, 259–336. (In Russ.)

16. Schmid W. Narratology. Moscow: Iazyki slavianskoi kultury, 2003, 312. (In Russ.)

17. Perrone-Moises L. L‘intertextualite critique. Poetique, 1976, (27): 372–384.

18. Wittgenstein L. Philosophical works. Moscow: Gnozis, 1994, part I, 612. (In Russ.)

19. Wittgenstein L. Philosophical works. Moscow: Gnozis, 1994, part II, 206. (In Russ.)

20. Genette G. Figures. Moscow: Izd-vo im. Sabashnikovykh, 1998, 944. (In Russ.)

21. Marino M., Wittig R. Netprov: Elements of an Emerging Form. Dichtung Digital, 2012, (42). Available at: http://www.dichtung-digital.de/en/journal/aktuelle-nummer/?postID=577 (accessed 08.01.2019).

22. Hayles K. N. The Borders of Madness. Science Fiction studies, 1991, 18(3): 321–323.

23. Sobchack V. Baudrillard’s obscenity. Science Fiction studies, 1991, 18(3): 327–329.

24. Porush D. The architextuality of transcendence. Science Fiction studies, 1991, 18(3): 323–325.

25. Ballard J. G. A Response to the Invitation to Respond. Science Fiction studies, 1991, 18(3): 329.


Review

For citations:


Kuchina S.A. Electronic Literary Text in the Framework of Post-Structuralism Textology. The Bulletin of Kemerovo State University. 2019;21(3):821-829. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21603/2078-8975-2019-21-3-821-829

Views: 702


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2949-2122 (Print)
ISSN 2949-2092 (Online)