AESTHETIC ASPECTS OF EKPHRASIS IN GUY DE MAUPASSANT’S SHORT STORY «UN PORTRAIT» («A PORTRAIT»)

The current article features the phenomenon of ekphrasis, i.e. a verbal representation of a work of fine arts in fiction, as presented in Guy de Maupassant’s short story "Un portrait". Aesthetic aspects of ekphrasis alongside the linguistic means of its expression are subjected to analysis. The leitmotif of the short story is the thematic motive of an enigmatic, inexplicable mystery that is unraveled at the end of the story. The firstperson narration begins with the description of a gentleman whose indescribable charm fascinates everyone he meets. Being invited to his house, the narrator notices a portrait of an extremely charming lady that happens to be the host’s mother, who died very young. That is how the mystery of the irresistible and captivating charm of the gentleman is solved. The portrait turns out to be a doppelganger of the host, and thus the archetypal ekphrastic motif of an image coming to life is realized. Both the main character of the story as a human being in the flesh and the image in the picture as a still, non-living work of art, manifest themselves as equally significant aesthetic objects, united by one common inherent quality, i.e. the magic and charm of beauty. The beauty does not ensue from the well-bred manners of the son or from a spell-binding expression of the mother’s eyes; the beauty lies in their capability of being absolutely natural, in harmony with their own selves. Aesthetic aspects of the ekphrastic description find their expression in a variety of linguistic means (epithets, metaphor, personification, simile, syntactic parallelism, etc.). Particular significance belongs to a big number of lexical units pertaining to visual perception, which is a specific feature of the archetypal scheme of ekphrasis. Equally important are the words and phrases characterizing the vitality of the image portrayed.

ekphrasis, a portrait, the archetypal scheme of ekphrasis, aesthetic vision, aesthetic object, the message of mystery, the motif of an image coming to life, the motif of a doppelganger, linguistic means of expressing ekphrasis

1. Urtmintseva M. G. Ekfrasis: nauchnaia problema i metodika ee issledovaniia [Ecphrasis: the scientific problem and the methodology of its investigation]. Vestnik Nizhegorodskogo universiteta im. N. I. Lobachevskogo = Bulletin of the Nizhny Novgorod University named after N.I. Lobachevsky, no. 4 (2010): 975–977.

2. Braginskaia N. V. Ekfrasis kak tip teksta (k probleme strukturnoi klassifikatsii) [Ecphrasis as a type of text (to the problem of structural classification)]. Slavianskoe i balkanskoe iazykoznanie. Karpato-vostochnoslavianskie paralleli. Struktura balkanskogo teksta [Slavic and Balkan linguistics. Carpathian-East Slavic parallels. Structure of the Balkan text]. Moscow: Nauka, 1977, 259–283.

3. Tret’iakov E. N. Ekfrasis kak sistema intersemioticheskikh transformatsii po matrichnomu metodu [Ecphrasis as a system of intersemiological transformations using the matrix method]. Vestnik Piatigorskogo gosudarstvennogo lingvisticheskogo universiteta = Bulletin of Pyatigorsk State Linguistic University, no. 4 (2012): 153–159.

4. Iatsenko E. V. «Liubite zhivopis’, poety…». Ekfrasis kak khudozhestvenno-mirovozzrencheskaia model’ [«Love painting, poets ...». Ekkfrasis as an artistic-ideological model]. Voprosy filosofii = Questions of philosophy, no. 11 (2011): 47–57.

5. Nikola M. I. Ekfrasis: aktualizatsiia priema i poniatiia [Ecphrasis: actualization of reception and concepts]. Vestnik Viatskogo gosudarstvennogo gumanitarnogo universiteta = Bulletin of Vyatka State Humanitarian University, 1, no. 2 (2010): 8–12.

6. Lukov V. A. Zhanry i zhanrovye generalizatsii [Genres and genre generalizations]. Znanie. Ponimanie. Umenie = Knowledge. Understanding. Skill, no. 1 (2006): 141–148.

7. Literaturnyi entsiklopedicheskii slovar’ [Literary Encyclopedic Dictionary]. Ed. Kozhevnikov V. M., Nikolaev P. A. Moscow: Sovetskaia entsiklopediia, 1987, 752.

8. Literaturnaia entsiklopediia terminov i poniatii [Literary Encyclopedia of Terms and Concepts]. Ed. Nikoliukin A. N. Moscow: Intelvak, 2001, 1600.

9. Sovremennyi slovar’-spravochnik po literature [Modern Dictionary of Literature]. Ed. Kormilov S. I. Moscow: Olimp: AST, 2000, 704.

10. Moskvin V. P. Stilistika russkogo iazyka: teoreticheskii kurs [Stylistics of the Russian language: theoretical course]. Rostov-on-Don: Feniks, 2006, 630.

11. Bart R. Izbrannye raboty: Semiotika. Poetika [Selected works: Semiotics. Poetics]. Moscow: Progress, 1994, 616.

12. Braginskaia N. V. «Kartiny» Filostrata Starshego: genezis i struktura dialoga pered izobrazheniem [«Pictures» of Philostratus the Elder: the genesis and structure of the dialogue before the image]. Odissei. Chelovek v istorii 1994. Kartina mira v narodnom i uchenom soznanii [Odysseus. Man in the history of 1994. The picture of the world in the popular and scientific consciousness]. Moscow: Nauka, 1994, 274–313.

13. Tret’iakov N. N. Obraz v iskusstve: osnovy kompozitsii [The image in art: the fundamentals of composition]. Kozel’sk: Sviato-Vvedenskaia Optina Pustyn’, 2001, 262.

14. Khalizev V. A. Teoriia literatury [Theory of Literature]. Moscow: Akademiia, 2009, 432.

15. Un portrait. Maupassant Guy de. L’inutile beauté. Paris: Flammarion, 1938, 171–178.

16. Tamarchenko N. D. Povestvovanie [Narrative]. Vvedenie v literaturovedenie. Literaturnoe proizvedenie. Osnovnye poniatiia i terminy [Introduction to literary criticism. Literary work. Basic concepts and terms]. Ed. Chernets L. V. Moscow: Vysshaia shkola; Akademiia, 1999, 279–295.

17. Mopassan Gi de. Polnoe sobranie sochinenii [Full composition of writings]. Transl. Danilin Iu. Moscow: Terra, vol. 9 (1996): 397.

18. Uspenskii B. A. Poetika kompozitsii [Poetics of composition]. Saint-Petersburg: Azbuka, 2000, 347.

19. Karpukhina T. P. Lingvoesteticheskaia igra morfemnogo povtora: teoreticheskaia model’ analiza fenomena chastichnoi iteratsii v khudozhestvennom tekste (na materiale angloiazychnoi khudozhestvennoi prozy). Diss. doktora filol. nauk [Linguoesthetic game of morphemic repetition: a theoretical model of the analysis of the phenomenon of partial iteration in an artistic text (on the material of English-language artistic prose). Dr. philol. Sci. Diss.]. Irkutsk State Linguistic Univ., Irkutsk, 2007, 458.

20. Tret’iakov E. N. Ekfrasis kak matrichnaia reprezentatsiia obraznykh znakov. Avtoref. diss. kand. filol. nauk [Ecphrasis as a matrix representation of figurative signs. Cand. philol. Sci. Diss. Abstr.]. Tver’, 2009, 19.

21. Losev A. F. Istoriia antichnoi estetiki. Sofisty. Sokrat. Platon [The history of ancient aesthetics. The Sophists. Socrates. Plato]. Moscow: AST; Folio, vol. 2 (2000): 846.

22. Nikitina I. P. Filosofiia iskusstva [Philosophy of Art]. Moscow: Omega-L, 2008, 559.

23. Bychkov V. V. Estetika [Aesthetics]. Moscow: KnoRus, 2012, 528.

24. Barskaia B. Ia. Gi de Mopassan i frantsuzskie khudozhniki ego vremeni [Guy de Maupassant and the French painters of his time]. Tipologicheskie sootvetstviia literatury i izobrazitel’nogo iskusstva [Typological correspondence of literature and art]. Ed. Shaikevich B. A. Kiev: Odessa: Vishcha shkola, 1975, 60–84.

25. Lotman Iu. M. Vnutri mysliashchikh mirov. Chelovek – tekst – semiosfera – istoriia [Inside the thinking worlds. Man – text – semiosphere – history]. Moscow: Iazyki russkoi kul’tury, 1996, 464.

26. Shatin Iu. V. Ozhivshie kartiny: ekfrasis i diegezis [Animated pictures: ekfrasis and diegesis]. Kritika i semiotika = Criticism and Semiotics, no. 7 (2004): 217–226.

27. Karpukhina T. P. Ekfrasticheskoe prochtenie stikhotvoreniia Teda Kh’iuza «Portraits» [The ecphatic reading of Ted Hughes’ poem Portraits]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta = Bulletin of the Tomsk State Pedagogical University, no. 10(151) (2014): 16–23.

28. Karpukhina T. P. Ekfrasis i ego funktsionirovanie v romane Somerseta Moema «The Moon and Sixpence» («Luna i grosh») [Ecphrasis and its functioning in the novel by Somerset Maugham «The Moon and Sixpence»]. Bulletin of the Kemerovo State University, no. 2 (2017): 200–205. DOI: 10.21603/2078-8975-2017-2-200-205.

29. Vishniakova E. P., Karpukhina T. P. Funktsionirovanie kategorii pertseptivnosti v novelle G. Uellsa «Strana slepykh» [The functioning of the category of perceptivity in the novel by Wells «The Country of the Blind»]. Vestnik Tikhookeanskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta = Bulletin of the Pacific State University, no. 2 (2013): 241–250.

30. Analiz poeticheskogo teksta [Analysis of the poetic text]. Lotman. Iu. M. O poetakh i poezii [About poets and poetry]. Saint-Petersburg: Iskusstvo-SPb, 2001, 18–252.

31. Freidenberg O. M. Poetika siuzheta i zhanra [Poetics of the plot and genre]. Ed. Braginskaia N. V. Moscow: Labirint, 1997, 448.