LINGUISTIC EXPERTISE IN LEGAL DISCOURSE: TYPES AND ASPECTS
https://doi.org/10.21603/2078-8975-2017-2-164-172
Abstract
The article is devoted to the relevance of special linguistic knowledge in legal discourse and the determination of the competence of an expert linguist. It features the analyses of the basis for the use of linguistic expertise in the aspect of the legal discourse. Special attention is given to the analysis of the relation between the concept of juridical discourse and the legislative discourse, law enforcement discourse, court discourse. The problem of classification of linguistic expertise with application of methods of the theory of classification and an example of subsumption classification division of linguistic expertise are considered. The problem of classification of linguistic expertise can be solved only through a systematic approach. It is shown that one of the most important issues of modern linguistic expertise is the problem of the choice from a wide range of experts as well as the interdisciplinary competence of the forensic linguist. The article includes analysis of the requirements to the experts. It is demonstrated that integrated (inter-disciplinary) investigations may be carried out, as it often happen in current practice, by a single examiner possessing all the necessary qualifications. The study is based on the general scientific dialectical method. The author uses the following special methods: systemstructural method, logical method, comparative method, as well as induction and analysis. The presented results provide ideas for further discussion on the problem of classification of linguistic expertise and interdisciplinary competence of the linguist-expert.
About the Author
M. V. Batyushkina
Legislative Assembly of Omsk Region
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
1, Krasnii Put St., Omsk, 644002
References
1. Golev N. D. Teoreticheskie aspekty iuridicheskogo funktsionirovaniia estestvennogo iazyka [The theoretical aspects of operation of natural language in the context of law activity]. Russkii iazyk: istoricheskie sud'by i sovremennost': Mat. III Mezhdunarodnogo kongressa [Russian language: its historical destiny and present state: Proc. III Intern. Congress]. Moscow: MGU. 2007, 779 – 780.
2. Kara-Murza E. S. Lingvisticheskaia ekspertiza kak instrument iazykovoi politiki [Linguistic expertise as a language policy tool]. Trudy instituta russkogo iazyka im. V. V. Vinogradova = Proceedings of the Institute of Russian language named after V. V. Vinogradov, no. 2-1 (2014): 204 – 211.
3. Batiushkina M. V. Lingvisticheskaia i pravovaia modeli klassifikatsii lingvisticheskikh ekspertiz [Classification of linguistic expertise: linguistic and legal models]. Politicheskaia lingvistika = Political Linguistics, no. 6 (2016): 222 – 230.
4. Saussure F. Kurs obshchei lingvistiki [Cours de linguistique generale]. Ed. Bally Ch. and Sechehaye A. Ekaterinburg: Izd-vo Ural. un-ta, 1999, 432.
5. Brinev K. I. Teoreticheskaia lingvistika i sudebnaia lingvisticheskaia ekspertiza. Avtoref. diss. doktora filol. nauk [Theoretical linguistics and forensic linguistic expertise. Dr. filol. Sci. Diss. Abstr.]. Kemerovo, 2010, 42.
6. Golev N. D., Matveeva O. N. Iurislingvisticheskaia ekspertiza: na styke iazyka i prava [Jurislinguistic examination at the meeting point of language and law]. Iurislingvistika = Jurilinguistic, no. 7 (2006): 192 – 212.
7. Nesterov A. V. Ekspertiza v obshchei teorii ekspertizy expertise [Expertise in the general theory of expertise of the Nizhny Novgorod region]. Teoriia i praktika sudebnoi ekspertizy = Theory and practice of forensic examination, no. 2(30) (2013): 162 – 168.
8. Kriukova E. A. Iazyk i stil' zakonodatel'nykh aktov. Avtoref. diss. kand. iurid. nauk [The language and style of the legal acts. Cand. legal Sci. Diss. Abstr.]. Moscow, 2003, 22.
9. Metodicheskie rekomendatsii po lingvisticheskoi ekspertize zakonoproektov [Methodological recommendations for the linguistic expertise of draft laws]. Kachestvo zakonodatel'stva i problemy iuridicheskoi tekhniki Materialy seminara s uchastiem rukovoditelei pravovykh sluzhb zakonodatel'nykh (predstavitel'nykh) i ispolnitel'nykh organov gosudarstvennoi vlasti sub"ektov Rossiiskoi Federatsii. Moskva, 15 oktiabria 2015 goda [The quality of legislation and legislative technique: The materials of the seminar with participation of heads of legal services of the legislative (representative) and Executive bodies of state power of subjects of the Russian Federation. Moscow, October 15, 2015]. Moscow: Izdanie Gosdumy, 2016, 235 – 271.
10. O normativnykh pravovykh aktakh Nizhegorodskoi oblasti [On normative legal acts of the Nizhny Novgorod region]. Nizhny Novgorod region law of February 10, 2005 No. 8-Z, adopted by the Legislative Assembly of Nizhny Novgorod region January 27, 2005, in edition of law of the Nizhny Novgorod region on August 5, 2014 No. 95-Z.
11. Batiushkina M. V. K voprosu ob opredelenii subzhanra tekstov zakonov o vnesenii izmenenii [On the question of defining of the subgenres of texts of laws on modification]. Vestnik Brianskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta = Bulletin of the Bryansk state University, no. 2(28) (2016): 118 – 124.
12. Alekseev S. S. Obshchaia teoriia prava [General theory of law]. Moscow: Iurid. lit., vol. 1 (1981): 360.
13. Krapivkina O. A. Dve grani diskursa – dve ipostasi sub"ekta [Two edges of discourse – two guises of the subject]. Sibirskii filologicheskii zhurnal = Siberian philological journal, no. 1 (2013): 137 – 143.
14. Shmelev A. D. Zdravyi smysl i lingvisticheskaia ekspertiza v razlichnykh pravovykh sistemakh [Common sense and linguistic examination in different legal systems]. Bulletin of Kemerovo State University, no. 3 (2016): 214 – 219.
15. Bondarenko E. N. Lingvisticheskaia ekspertiza dokumentov: formulirovka voprosov, ustanovlenie konteksta i semantiki kliuchevykh slov [Linguistic expertise of documents: the wording of questions and the context of the establishment of the semantics of the keywords]. Iazyk i pravo: aktual'nye problemy vzaimodeistviia: Materialy V-oi Mezhdunarodnoi prakticheskoi konferentsii [Language and law: actual problems of interaction: Proc. V Intern. Prac. Conf.]. Rostov-on-Don, 2015, 216 – 224.
16. Galiashina E. I. Metodologicheskie osnovy sudebnogo rechevedeniia. Avtoref. diss. doktora filol. nauk [Methodological principles of forensic examinations of speech. Dr. filol. Sci. Diss. Abstr.]. Moscow, 2003, 58.
17. Galiashina E. I. Sudebnaia lingvisticheskaia ekspertiza v grazhdanskom sudoproizvodstve: vostrebovannost' i kompetentsii [Forensic Linguistic Examination in Civil Proceedings: Relevance and Competence]. Zakony Rossii: opyt, analiz, praktika = Laws of Russia: experience, analysis, practice, no. 10 (2015): 17 – 21.
18. Rossinskaia E. R. Sovremennye predstavleniia o predmete i sisteme sudebnoi ekspertologii [Current understanding of object and system of the forensic expertise]. Lex russica, no. 4 (2013): 421 – 428.
19. Alekseeva T. A. Kriminalisticheskoe uchenie o rechi: istoriko-soderzhatel'nyi aspekt [Criminalistical study of oral speech: historical aspect]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta = Vestnik of Tomsk state University, no. 343 (2011): 113 – 115.
20. Alekseeva T. A. Osobennosti ustnoi rechi i ikh ispol'zovanie v kriminalistike [The peculiarities of speech in criminalistics]. Obshchestvennye nauki = Social Sciences, no. 1 (2012): 217 – 223.
21. Anufrieva E. A. Problemy naznacheniia fonoskopicheskoi ekspertizy pri raskrytii i rassledovanii korruptsionnykh prestuplenii [Issues of commissioning a phonoscopic examination in detection and investigation of corruption crimes]. Rossiiskii sledovatel' = Russian investigator, no. 22 (2015): 3 – 7.
22. Kalugina E. N., Volkogonova A. V. Lingvisticheskaia ekspertiza anonimnogo teksta: metody i podkhody [The linguistic examination of the anonymous text: approaches and methods]. Vestnik APK Stavropol'ia = Vestnik APK Stavropol, no. 2(22) (2016): 166 – 168.
23. Sokolova T. P. Neimingovaia ekspertiza v grazhdanskom sudoproizvodstve: organizatsionnye i metodicheskie problemy [Naming examination in court practice: methodical and applied problems]. Zakony Rossii: opyt, analiz, praktika = Laws of Russia: experience, analysis, practice, no. 10 (2015): 22 – 27.
24. Laktionova E. B. Analiticheskii obzor osnovnykh podkhodov k psikhologicheskoi ekspertize obrazovatel'noi sredy [A complex review of current trends in the examination of the educational environment]. Izvestiia Rossiiskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta im. A. I. Gertsena = Izvestia of Russian state pedagogical University named A. I. Herzen, no. 68 (2008): 18 – 32.
25. Podkalitina M. L. Sudebnaia lingvisticheskaia ekspertiza ekstremistskikh materialov: teoreticheskie i metodicheskie aspekty. Avtoref. diss. kand. iurid. nauk [Forensic linguistic expertise of the extremist materials: theoretical and methodological aspect. Cand. legal Sci. Diss. Abstr.]. Moscow, 2013, 28.
Review
For citations:
Batyushkina M.V. LINGUISTIC EXPERTISE IN LEGAL DISCOURSE: TYPES AND ASPECTS. The Bulletin of Kemerovo State University. 2017;(2):164-172. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21603/2078-8975-2017-2-164-172
Views:
984
Email this article 