ACCUSATION / INSULT: ASPECTS OF THE QUALIFICATION IN EXPERT PRACTICE
https://doi.org/10.21603/2078-8975-2016-3-129-135
Abstract
Peer review of statements and texts for insult still remains a challenging field of linguotextology. The paper discusses the signs of invective communicative acts, and describes those factors, the analysis helps the expert to describe the content and form of speech influence. Rejecting the formal-stylistic approach to the concept of norms in the field of speech interaction and to the characterization of “indecent form”, which is the key to the proceedings of the insult, the author of this paper offers a linguistic and communicative approach, based on the analysis of the components of the speech act.
References
1. Araeva L. A., Osadchii M. A. Problemy sudebno-lingvisticheskoi ekspertizy v ramkakh del o zashchite chesti i dostoinstva o klevete i oskorblenii [Problems of forensic linguistic examination within the framework of cases of defamation and insult libel]. Rossiiskii iuridicheskii zhurnal – Russian law journal, no. 2 (2006): 86 – 94.
2. Bel'chikov Iu. A. Invektivnaia leksika v kontekste nekotorykh tendentsii v sovremennoi russkoi rechevoi kommunikatsii [Invective vocabulary in the context of some of the trends in modern Russian speech communication]. Filologicheskie nauki – Philological Sciences, no. 4 (2002): 66 – 74.
3. Baranov A. N. Lingvisticheskaia ekspertiza teksta [Linguistic expertise teksta]. Moscow: Flinta; Nauka, 2013.
4. Brinev K. I. Problema ekspertnoi otsenki oskorbleniia. Oskorblenie v pravosoznanii lingvista. Oskorblenie kak rechevoi akt [Problem peer review insults. Insult to the sense of justice of the linguist. Insulting a speech act]. Iurislingvistika – Yurislingvistika, no. 11 (2011): 330 – 339.
5. Golev N. D. Rechevoi zhanr ssory i invektivnye freimy v rasskazakh V. M. Shukshina [Speech genre of argument and invective frames stories in V. M. Shukshin]. Kul'tura. Obrazovanie. Dukhovnost': Materialy Vserossiiskoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii, posviashchennoi 60-letiiu Biiskogo gospedinstituta [Culture. Education. Spirituality:
6. Proc. all-Russian Sc.-Prac. Conf. dedicated to the 60th anniversary of the Biysk state pedagogical Institute]. Biisk, NITs BiGPI, 1999, part 2, 109 – 112.
7. Golev N. D. Iurislingvistika i pragmatika: o dvukh strategiiakh obvineniia v slovesnoi invektive i zashchity ot nego [Yurislingvistika and pragmatics: two charges strategies in verbal invective and protection from it]. Iazykovaia kontseptsiia regional'nogo sushchestvovaniia cheloveka i etnosa: Tez. dokl. k regional'noi nauch.-prakt. konf. pamiati professora I. A. Vorob'evoi (70 let so dnia rozhdeniia) [The concept of regional linguistic human existence and ethnicity: Proc. Reg. Sc.-Prac. Conf. in memory of Prof. I. A. Vorobyeva (70 years since birthday)]. Ed. Chesnokova V. A. Barnaul: Izd-vo Alt. un-ta, 1999, 146 – 148.
8. Golev N. D. Iurislingvisticheskii slovar' invektivnoi leksiki russkogo iazyka (k postanovke problemy) [Yurislingvistichesky Dictionary invective Russian vocabulary (to the problem)]. Aktual'nye problemy rusistiki: Materialy mezhdunarodnoi nauchnoi konferentsii, posviashchennoi 85-letiiu tomskoi dialektologicheskoi shkoly i 125-letiiu Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta (Tomsk, 21 – 23 oktiabria 2003 g.) [Actual problems of Russian studies: Proc. Intern. Sc. Conf.e devoted to 85-th anniversary of Tomsk dialect school and the 125th anniversary of Tomsk state University (Tomsk, October 21 – 23, 2003)]. Tomsk, part 1, vol. 2 (2007): 92 – 97.
9. Golev N. D. Mnozhestvennost' interpretatsii rechevykh proizvedenii kak faktor kommunikativnogo konflikta mezhdu ikh avtorom i adresatom [The multiplicity of interpretations voice works as the factor of communicative conflict between their author and the addressee]. Zhitnikovskie chteniia-7: Dialog iazykov i kul'tur v gumanisticheskoi paradigme: Materialy nauch. konf. [Janikowski reading-7: Dialogue of languages and cultures in the humanistic paradigm: Proc. Sc. Conf.]. Ed. Novoselova N. A. Cheliabinsk, 2004, 114 – 116.
10. Zhel'vis V. I. Pole brani: Skvernoslovie kak sotsial'naia problema v iazykakh i kul'turakh mira [Battlefield: Swearing as a social problem in the languages and cultures of the world]. 2nd ed. Moscow: Nauchno-izdatel'skii tsentr «Ladomir», 2001, 352.
11. Zhel'vis V. I. Slovo i delo: iuridicheskii aspekt skvernosloviia [Word and Deed: legal aspect]. Iurislingvistika – Yurislingvistika, no. 2 (2000): 194 – 206.
12. Zhel'vis V. I. «Oskorblenie» ili «obida»: popytka differentsiatsii ["Insult" or "insult": an attempt to differentiate]. Iurislingvistika – Yurislingvistika, no. 9 (2008): 155 – 162.
13. Ivanenko G. S. Lingvisticheskaia ekspertiza v protsessakh po zashchite chesti, dostoinstva, delovoi reputatsii [Lingvisticheskaya expertise in the protection of the honor of processes, dignity and business reputation]. Cheliabinsk: Poligraf-master, 2006.
14. Kusov G. V. Oskorblenie kak illokutivnyi lingvokul'turnyi kontsept. Avtoref. diss. kand. filol. nauk [Insult both illocutionary lingvokulturnyj concept. Cand. filol. Sci. Diss. Abstr.]. Volgograd, 2004.
15. Kusov G. V. Sudebnaia lingvisticheskaia ekspertiza «oskorbleniia»: reshenie problemy «neprilichnaia forma» [Forensic linguistic examination "insults": solving the problem of "indecent form"]. Rossiiskii sud'ia – Russian judge, no. 5 (2013): 43 – 48.
16. Sternin I. A. Oskorblenie i neprilichnaia iazykovaia forma kak predmet lingvisticheskoi ekspertizy (bytovoe i iuridicheskoe ponimanie) [Insults and obscene language form as an object of linguistic expertise (domestic and legal understanding)]. Antropotekst-1 [Antropotekst-1]. Tomsk, 2006.
17. Sharifullin B. Ia. Iazykovaia agressiia i iazykovoe nasilie v svete iurislingvistiki: problema invektivy [Language aggression and violence in the light of linguistic yurislingvistiki: problem invective]. Iurislingvistika – Yurislingvistika, no. 5 (2004): 126 – 137.
Review
For citations:
Ivanenko G.S. ACCUSATION / INSULT: ASPECTS OF THE QUALIFICATION IN EXPERT PRACTICE. The Bulletin of Kemerovo State University. 2016;(3):129-135. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21603/2078-8975-2016-3-129-135
Views:
735
Email this article 