TO THE QUESTION OF PERSONALITY DETERMINANTS OF PARENTING: FATHERING AND MASCULINITY
Abstract
The paper analyzes the results of the fathering and masculinity study. The possibilities for men with different masculinity types to be a good father are described. The paper presents the data on the longitude survey of the dynamics of spouses’ gender characteristics self-evaluation during pregnancy, childbirth and having a newlyborn baby.
About the Author
Yu. V. Borisenko
Kemerovo State University
Russian Federation
Yuliya V. Borisenko – Candidate of Psychology, Assistant Professor at the Department of General Psychology and Psychology of Development
Russian Federation
Yuliya V. Borisenko – Candidate of Psychology, Assistant Professor at the Department of General Psychology and Psychology of Development
References
1. Белогай К. Н., Морозова И. С. Эмпирическое исследование структуры родительского отношения // Психологическая наука и образование. 2008. № 4. С. 12 – 23.
2. Борисенко Ю. В., Белогай К. Н. Специфика формирования отцовства как психологического феномена // Сибирский психологический журнал. 2007. № 26. С. 102 – 108.
3. Борисенко Ю. В. Адаптация методики Caregiving and Breadwinning Reflected Appraisal Inventory (CBIRAI) на русский язык // Вектор науки ТГУ. (Серия: Педагогика, психология). 2013. № 4(15). С. 34 – 37.
4. Кон И. С. Мужчина в меняющемся мире. М.: Время, 2009. 496 с.
5. Морозова И. С., Борисенко Ю. В., Белогай К. Н., Отт Т. О. Технологии формирования конструктивной репродуктивной мотивации и профилактики абортивного поведения молодежи: учебно-методическое пособие. Кемерово, 2014. 158 с.
6. Чикалова Е. А. Исследования отцовства и маскулинности: точки пересечения // Женщина в российском обществе. 2012. № 2. С. 43 – 53.
7. Bouchard G. Intergenerational Transmission and Transition to Fatherhood: A Mediated-Moderation Model of Paternal Engagement // Journal of Family. 2012. Vol. 26. № 5. P. 747 – 755.
8. Connell R., Messerschmidt J. W. Hegemonic masculinity: rethinking the concept // Gender and Society, 2005. Vol. 19. № 6 P. 829 – 859.
9. Doherty W. J., Boss P. G., LaRossa R., Schumm W. R., Steinmetz S. K. Family theories and methods: A contextual approach // P. G. Boss, W J. Doherty, R. LaRossa, W. R. Schumm, S. K. Steinmetz Family theories and methods: A contextual approach. New York: Plenum Press, 1993.
10. Eggebeen D. J., Knoester C. Does fatherhood matter for men? // Journal of Marriage and Family, 2001. № 63. P. 381 – 393.
11. Fthenakis W. E. Vater, Band I, Zur Psychologie der Vater-Kind-Beziehung. Munchen: Urban & Schwarzenberg, 1985.
12. Maurer T. W., Pleck J. H., Rane T. R. Parental identity and reflected appraisals: Measurement and gender dynamics // Journal of Marriage and the Family. 2001. № 63. P. 309 – 321.
13. Parke R. D. Fathers and families. In M. H. Bornstein // Handbook of parenting. Mahwah, NJ: Laurence Erlbaum Associates, 2002. Vol. 3. P. 27 – 73.
14. Pleck J. H., Hofferth S. Mother involvement as an influence on father involvement with early adolescents // Fathering. 2008. № 6. P. 267 – 286.
15. Pleck J. H. Paternal involvement: revised conceptualization and theoretical linkages with child outcomes and paternal involvement: levels, sources, and consequences // Lamb M. E. The role of the father in child development (5th ed.). New York: Wiley, 2010. P. 58 – 93.
Review
For citations:
Borisenko Yu.V. TO THE QUESTION OF PERSONALITY DETERMINANTS OF PARENTING: FATHERING AND MASCULINITY. SibScript. 2015;1(2-1):112-118. (In Russ.)
Views:
369
Email this article 