<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">kemsu</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">СибСкрипт</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>SibScript</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">2949-2122</issn><issn pub-type="epub">2949-2092</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Kemerovo State University</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">kemsu-838</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>ИСТОРИЯ РОССИИ</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>Russian history</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>АРХЕОГРАФИЧЕСКИЕ АСПЕКТЫ ИЗУЧЕНИЯ АНГЛИЙСКОГО ПАРЛАМЕНТА 1628 – 1629 ГГ.</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>THE ENGLISH PARLIAMENT SITTINGS IN 1628 – 1629: AN ARCHEOGRAPHIC APPROACH</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Ющенко</surname><given-names>А. В.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Yushchenko</surname><given-names>A. V.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Ющенко Анастасия Викторовна – ассистент кафедры Новой истории и международных отношений, аспирант по направлению Всеобщая история Института истории и политических наук</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Anastasiya V. Yushchenko – Assistant Lecturer at the Department of Modern History and International Relations, post-graduate student at the Institute of History and Political Science</p></bio><email xlink:type="simple">stasy_stasy2009@mail.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff-1"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>Тюменский государственный университет</institution><country>Россия</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>Tyumen State University</institution><country>Russian Federation</country></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2015</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>15</day><month>03</month><year>2016</year></pub-date><volume>0</volume><issue>4-1</issue><fpage>49</fpage><lpage>53</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Ющенко А.В., 2015</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2015</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Ющенко А.В.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Yushchenko A.V.</copyright-holder><license xml:lang="ru" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.</license-p></license><license xml:lang="en" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://www.sibscript.ru/jour/article/view/838">https://www.sibscript.ru/jour/article/view/838</self-uri><abstract><p>В данной статье осуществляется археографический анализ источниковой базы по сессии английского парламента 1628 – 1629 гг. Автором предпринята попытка выделения основных этапов изданий документов типографским способом, проливающих свет на коллизии парламентской борьбы предреволюционной Англии. В основном, представленный материал позволяет успешно проследить историю публикаций источников в Англии с XVII по XX вв. Целью исследования также является выявление идейно-политического спектра, на фоне которого и осуществлялась издательская деятельность ценнейших источников по истории развития английского парламентаризма. Новизна археографического исследования данной сессии предреволюционной Англии видится в отсутствии подобных публикаций, столь необходимых при изучении предпосылок Революции и истории парламента в частности. Актуальность исследования обусловлена уникальностью политической и правовой истории Англии от других европейских стран. Последовательное возрастание роли парламента как в период гражданской войны, так и после нее, происходило на фоне общеевропейской тенденции к абсолютизму. Поэтому именно на примере истории Английского парламента важно проследить столь редкий опыт сохранения базовых правовых ценностей. Таким образом, обзор ключевых изданий источников по обозначенному периоду, а также представленный анализ господствующих теоретических течений, обусловивших их публикации позволяют полнее осветить историю парламентской борьбы и революции в Англии в контексте ее последующего историко-теоретического осмысления</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>The paper features an archeographic analysis of the primary sources for the English Parliament sittings in 1628 – 1629. The author attempted to establish the main stages in publishing the documents which reveal the nature of the Parliamentary debates in the pre-revolutionary England. The sources analyzed allow tracing down the publication history for the primary sources in England in the 17th-20th centuries. The aim of the research is also to lay down the ideological and political framework which served as a publishing background for the sources concerning the development of the English parliamentary system. Such archeographic research is original as there are no such analyses necessary to study the backgrounds of the revolution and the history of the Parliamentary system in particular. A thematic justification for conducting this research is that the legal and political history of England differs from that of other European countries. The Parliament became more and more important, both in times of the Civil War and afterwards, and its role became more significant within the European trend in striving for absolute power consolidation. In this regard the history of the English Parliament reveals a unique experience in preserving the fundamental legal values. Analyzing the key primary sources for the given period as well as the leading political trends which provided for later publications allows revealing the nature of the Parliamentary debates and the consequent revolution in England from the historical point of view.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>Карл I Стюарт</kwd><kwd>Английский Парламент</kwd><kwd>археография</kwd><kwd>заседания и дебаты</kwd><kwd>личные дневники</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>Charles I Stuart</kwd><kwd>English Parliament</kwd><kwd>archaeography</kwd><kwd>proceedings and debates</kwd><kwd>private diaries</kwd></kwd-group><funding-group><funding-statement xml:lang="ru">Президент РФ</funding-statement></funding-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Дмитриева О. В. Парламент и политическая культура в Англии второй половины XVI – начала XVII в.: дис. … д-ра ист. наук. М., 2011. 1436 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Дмитриева О. В. Парламент и политическая культура в Англии второй половины XVI – начала XVII в.: дис. … д-ра ист. наук. М., 2011. 1436 с.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Источниковедение и компаративный метод в гуманитарном знании: тезисы докладов и сообщений научной конференции. Москва, 29 – 31 января 1996. 448 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Источниковедение и компаративный метод в гуманитарном знании: тезисы докладов и сообщений научной конференции. Москва, 29 – 31 января 1996. 448 с.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Козлов В. П. Теоретические основы археографии с позиций современности // Отечественные архивы. 2001. № 1. С. 10 – 33.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Козлов В. П. Теоретические основы археографии с позиций современности // Отечественные архивы. 2001. № 1. С. 10 – 33.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Кондратьев С. В. «Ода «вольность» английских юристов и парламентариев, или к вопросу о том, как принималась «Петиция о праве» // Европа. 2013. С. 106 – 120.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Кондратьев С. В. «Ода «вольность» английских юристов и парламентариев, или к вопросу о том, как принималась «Петиция о праве» // Европа. 2013. С. 106 – 120.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Books and readers in early modern England. Material studies / Ed. by J. Andersen and E. Sauer, 2002. University of Pennsylvania Press. 312 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Books and readers in early modern England. Material studies / Ed. by J. Andersen and E. Sauer, 2002. University of Pennsylvania Press. 312 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Commons Debates 1628 / Ed. by R. C. Johnson, M. F. Keeler. London, 1977, 4 vols.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Commons Debates 1628 / Ed. by R. C. Johnson, M. F. Keeler. London, 1977, 4 vols.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Commons Debates for 1629 / Ed. by W. Notestein, F. H. Relf. Minneapolis, 1921. 304 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Commons Debates for 1629 / Ed. by W. Notestein, F. H. Relf. Minneapolis, 1921. 304 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit8"><label>8</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ephemeris parliamentaria; or a faithfull register of the transactions in Parliament: In the third and fourth years of the reign of our late sovereign lord, King Charles: containing the severall speeches, cases, and arguments of law transacted between his majesty and both houses. Together with the grand mysteries of the kingdome then in agitation / Ed. by T. Fuller. London: Printed for John Williams and Francis Eglesfield. 1654.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ephemeris parliamentaria; or a faithfull register of the transactions in Parliament: In the third and fourth years of the reign of our late sovereign lord, King Charles: containing the severall speeches, cases, and arguments of law transacted between his majesty and both houses. Together with the grand mysteries of the kingdome then in agitation / Ed. by T. Fuller. London: Printed for John Williams and Francis Eglesfield. 1654.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit9"><label>9</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Gardiner S. R. History of England from the Accession of James I to the Outbreak of the Civil War, 1603 – 1642. Cambridge University Press, 2011. 10 Vol.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Gardiner S. R. History of England from the Accession of James I to the Outbreak of the Civil War, 1603 – 1642. Cambridge University Press, 2011. 10 Vol.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit10"><label>10</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Hart J. S. Justice upon Petition: The House of Lords and the Reformation of Justice, 1621 – 1675. L., 1991.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Hart J. S. Justice upon Petition: The House of Lords and the Reformation of Justice, 1621 – 1675. L., 1991.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit11"><label>11</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Historical Collections: Abridg'd and Improv'd / Ed. by Rushworth. Fol. I. 1703. 476 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Historical Collections: Abridg'd and Improv'd / Ed. by Rushworth. Fol. I. 1703. 476 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit12"><label>12</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Raymond T. The Parliamentary or Constitutional History of England. London, 1751 – 1761. 24 vols.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Raymond T. The Parliamentary or Constitutional History of England. London, 1751 – 1761. 24 vols.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit13"><label>13</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Return of the Name of Every Member of the Lower House of Parliament of England, Scotland, and Ireland 1213 to 1874. London, 1878. 2 vols.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Return of the Name of Every Member of the Lower House of Parliament of England, Scotland, and Ireland 1213 to 1874. London, 1878. 2 vols.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit14"><label>14</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Rushworth. A Compleat Catalogue of All the Stitch’d Books and Single Sheets / Ed. by Rushworth. London, 1680.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Rushworth. A Compleat Catalogue of All the Stitch’d Books and Single Sheets / Ed. by Rushworth. London, 1680.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit15"><label>15</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Russell C. The Crisis of Parliaments: English History, 1509 – 1660. Oxford. 1971.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Russell C. The Crisis of Parliaments: English History, 1509 – 1660. Oxford. 1971.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit16"><label>16</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Sir Thomas Crew's Collection of the Proceedings of the Parliament in 1628 / Ed. by J. Parkhurst. London, 1707. 174 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Sir Thomas Crew's Collection of the Proceedings of the Parliament in 1628 / Ed. by J. Parkhurst. London, 1707. 174 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit17"><label>17</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Smith D. L. The Stuart Parliaments. 1603 – 1689. L., 1999.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Smith D. L. The Stuart Parliaments. 1603 – 1689. L., 1999.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit18"><label>18</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Sources of English History of the Seventeenth Century, 1603 – 1689. Bibliographical series / Ed. by J. T. Gerould, University of Minnesota. Library, 1921, 565 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Sources of English History of the Seventeenth Century, 1603 – 1689. Bibliographical series / Ed. by J. T. Gerould, University of Minnesota. Library, 1921, 565 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit19"><label>19</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">The Diurnall Occurrences in this great and happy Parliament, from the 3 d of November, 1640, to the 3 d of November, 1641 of Both Houses / Ed. by W. Cooke. London, 1641.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">The Diurnall Occurrences in this great and happy Parliament, from the 3 d of November, 1640, to the 3 d of November, 1641 of Both Houses / Ed. by W. Cooke. London, 1641.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit20"><label>20</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">The Politics of Information in Early Modern Europe / Ed. by B. Dooly and S. A. Baron. London and New York, Routledge. 2005. 320 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">The Politics of Information in Early Modern Europe / Ed. by B. Dooly and S. A. Baron. London and New York, Routledge. 2005. 320 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
