kemsuСибСкриптSibScript2949-21222949-2092Kemerovo State University10.21603/2078-8975-2022-24-1-18-25QFWMJUkemsu-5166Research ArticleИстория и археологияHistory and archeologyПовестка ЕС в области миграции и развития в отношении стран АКТ: вызовы пандемииThe EU Agenda on Migration and Development towards ACP countries: Challenges of the Pandemichttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-3003-4757ПогорельскаяАнастасия МихайловнаPogorelskayaAnastasia M.pogorelskaya@mail.tsu.ruНациональный исследовательский Томский государственный университет (Россия, г. Томск)National Research Tomsk State University (Russia, Tomsk)2022110420222411825Copyright © Погорельская А.М., 20222022Погорельская А.М.Pogorelskaya A.M.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://www.sibscript.ru/jour/article/view/5166

Рассмотрена повестка Европейского союза в области миграции и развития на протяжении последних 30 лет. Цель – оценить степень ее преемственности, задачи: определить основные тренды политики Евросоюза в области миграции и развития; выявить вызовы, которые пандемия поставила перед сотрудничеством ЕС со странами Африки, Карибского и Тихоокеанского бассейнов (АКТ) по вопросам миграции и развития. Сделан вывод, что в повестке ЕС в области миграции и развития на протяжении последних десятилетий наблюдается преемственность. Однако если для Евросоюза мотивирование сотрудничества в сфере миграции путем предоставления помощи развитию становится нормой, то для стран АКТ такое видение сотрудничества не является очевидным и желательным. В этой связи в повестке отношений ЕС и Организации стран АКТ наметились противоречия, которые, несмотря на формальное продолжение сотрудничества после истечения срока действия договора Котону, пока не удалось преодолеть. Основными трендами политики ЕС стали принцип кондициональности и попытки ЕС отойти от универсального подхода к партнерам из числа стран АКТ. Пандемия обострила существующие противоречия между сторонами по вопросам миграции и развития и не дала возможности внести необходимые коррективы в политику развития ЕС. Последствия пандемии: рост секьюритизации иммиграции по всему миру; ужесточение правил въезда и иммиграционной политики многих стран в целом; необходимость расширения доступа к услугам системы здравоохранения собственных граждан, а также иммигрантов и беженцев – будут влиять на динамику отношений Евросоюза со странами АКТ. 

The article covers 30 years of EU agenda on migration and development. The research objective was to assess its continuity, determine the main trends, and outline the challenges that the cooperation between the EU and the ACP has to face after the pandemic. The EU agenda on migration and development proved to be rather stable. However, the EU motivates migration cooperation by development aid while most ACP countries do not welcome this approach. As a result, the contradictions between the EU and the ACP still exist, despite their formal cooperation after the Cotonou agreement expired. The main trends in the EU policy were the principle of conditionality and the EU's attempts to abandon the universal approach to their ACP partners. The COVID-19 pandemic has aggravated the contradictions in migration and development issues, thus preventing the European Union from upgrading its development policy. The pandemic has the following consequences: global increase in securitization of immigration; strict entry rules and immigration policies; the prospect of expanding access to health care systems for citizens and immigrants. These consequences will inevitably affect the relations between the EU and the ACP.

содействие развитиюмиграциямотивыкоординация политикиЕвропейский союзстраны Африкистраны Карибского бассейнастраны Тихоокеанского бассейнапандемияdevelopment assistancemigrationmotivespolicies coordinationthe European UnionAfrican statesCaribbean statesPacific statespandemicИсследование выполнено при финансовой поддержке РНФ, проект № 22-28-00187 «"Неопределенность" как норма жизни: идентичность ЕС в условиях глобальных трансформаций». https://rscf. ru/project/22-28-00187/The research was supported by the Russian Science Foundation, project no. 22-28-00187 "Uncertainty as the Norm of Life: The EU Identity & Global Transformations". https:// rscf.ru/project/22-28-00187/ReferencesБартенев В. И. «Традиционные» доноры vs страны БРИКС: дивергенция моделей сотрудничества в целях развития. Конкуренция и конфликтность в мировой экономике и политике, отв. ред. Ю. Д. Квашнин, Н. В. Тоганова, С. В. Уткин. М.: ИМЭМО РАН, 2013. Вып. 10. C. 78–86.Bartenev V. I. Traditional donors vs BRICS countries: divergence of the development cooperation models. Competition and conflicts in the world economy and politics, eds. Kvashnin Yu. D., Toganova N. V., Utkin S. V. Moscow: IMEMO, 2013, iss. 10, 78–86. (In Russ.)Ермолов М. Границы и масштабы российского содействия международному развитию. РСМД. 03.08.2021. Режим доступа: https://russiancouncil.ru/analytics-and-comments/analytics/granitsy-i-masshtaby-rossiyskogo-sodeystviyamezhdunarodnomu-razvitiyu/ (дата обращения: 04.01.2022)Ermolov M. Boundaries and the scale of Russian development assistance. Russian International Affairs Council, 3 Aug 2021. Available at: https://russiancouncil.ru/analytics-and-comments/analytics/granitsy-i-masshtaby-rossiyskogo-sodeystviyamezhdunarodnomu-razvitiyu/ (accessed 4 Jan 2022). (In Russ.)Зайцев Ю. К. Россия как международный донор: трудности в оценке помощи развитию. РСМД. 07.08.2020. Режим доступа: https://russiancouncil.ru/analytics-and-comments/analytics/rossiya-kak-mezhdunarodnyy-donor-trudnosti-votsenke-pomoshchi-razvitiyu/ (дата обращения: 04.01.2022)Zaytsev Yu. K. Russia as international donor: difficulties in evaluating the development aid. Russian International Affairs Council, 7 Aug 2020. Available at: https://russiancouncil.ru/analytics-and-comments/analytics/rossiya-kak-mezhdunarodnyydonor-trudnosti-v-otsenke-pomoshchi-razvitiyu/ (accessed 4 Jan 2022). (In Russ.)Susskind D., Manyika J., Saldanha J., Burrow Sh., Rebelo S., Bremmer I. Life Post–COVID-19. Finance & Development, 2020, 57(2): 26–29.Susskind D., Manyika J., Saldanha J., Burrow Sh., Rebelo S., Bremmer I. Life Post–COVID-19. Finance & Development, 2020, 57(2): 26–29.Mofijur M., Rizwanul Fattaha I. M., Asraful Alam Md., Saiful Islam A. B. M., Chyuan Ong H., Ashrafur Rahman S. M., Najafi G., Ahmed S. F., Alhaz Uddin Md., Mahlia T. M. I. Impact of COVID-19 on the social, economic, environmental and energy domains: lessons learnt from a global pandemic. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 2021, 26: 343–359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2020.10.016Mofijur M., Rizwanul Fattaha I. M., Asraful Alam Md., Saiful Islam A. B. M., Chyuan Ong H., Ashrafur Rahman S. M., Najafi G., Ahmed S. F., Alhaz Uddin Md., Mahlia T. M. I. Impact of COVID-19 on the social, economic, environmental and energy domains: lessons learnt from a global pandemic. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 2021, 26: 343–359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2020.10.016Watermeyer R., Shankar K., Crick T., Knight C., McGaughey F., Hardman J., Suri V. R., Chung R., Phelan D. "Pandemia": a reckoning of UK universities’ corporate response to COVID-19 and its academic fallout. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 2021, 42(5-6): 651–666. https://doi.org/10.1080/01425692.2021.1937058Watermeyer R., Shankar K., Crick T., Knight C., McGaughey F., Hardman J., Suri V. R., Chung R., Phelan D. "Pandemia": a reckoning of UK universities’ corporate response to COVID-19 and its academic fallout. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 2021, 42(5-6): 651–666. https://doi.org/10.1080/01425692.2021.1937058Furness M., Ghica L.-A., Lightfoot S., Szent-Iványi B. EU development policy: evolving as an instrument of foreign policy and as an expression of solidarity. Journal of Contemporary European Research, 2020, 16(2): 89–100. https://doi.org/10.30950/jcer.v16i2.1156Furness M., Ghica L.-A., Lightfoot S., Szent-Iványi B. EU development policy: evolving as an instrument of foreign policy and as an expression of solidarity. Journal of Contemporary European Research, 2020, 16(2): 89–100. https://doi.org/10.30950/jcer.v16i2.1156Дегтерев Д. А. Содействие международному развитию как инструмент продвижения внешнеполитических и внешнеэкономических интересов. Вестник МГИМО-Университета. 2012. № 2. С. 47–58. https://doi.org/10.24833/2071-8160-2012-2-23-47-58Degterev D. A. Game-theorу analysis of international development assistance regimes. MGIMO Review of International Relations, 2012, (2): 47–58. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24833/2071-8160-2012-2-23-47-58Olofsgård A., Perrotta Berlin M., Frot E. Aid motivation in early and mature partnerships: is there a difference? Stockholm Institute of Transition Economics Working Paper, 2012, (17): 1–38.Olofsgård A., Perrotta Berlin M., Frot E. Aid motivation in early and mature partnerships: is there a difference? Stockholm Institute of Transition Economics Working Paper, 2012, (17): 1–38.Lis P. The impact of armed conflict and terrorism on foreign aid: a sector-level analysis. World Development, 2018, 110: 283–294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2018.06.009Lis P. The impact of armed conflict and terrorism on foreign aid: a sector-level analysis. World Development, 2018, 110: 283–294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2018.06.009Погорельская А. М. Внешнеполитические инструменты регулирования иммиграции в ЕС: политика развития. Вестник Томского государственного университета. 2014. № 383. С. 114–118.Pogorelskaya A. M. Common foreign policy instruments used for migration regulation: the case of development policy. Tomsk State University Journal, 2014, (383): 114–118. (In Russ.)De Haas H. Turning the tide? Why development will not stop migration. Development and Change, 2007, 38(5): 819–841. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7660.2007.00435.xDe Haas H. Turning the tide? Why development will not stop migration. Development and Change, 2007, 38(5): 819–841. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7660.2007.00435.xSzymańska J., Kugiel P. Development aid as a tool of the EU’s migration policy. Studia z Polityki Publicznej, 2020, 7(4): 65–81. https://doi.org/10.33119/KSzPP/2020.4.4Szymańska J., Kugiel P. Development aid as a tool of the EU’s migration policy. Studia z Polityki Publicznej, 2020, 7(4): 65–81. https://doi.org/10.33119/KSzPP/2020.4.4Dimier V. Constructing conditionality: the bureaucratization of EC development aid. European Foreign Affairs Review, 2006, (11): 263–280.Dimier V. Constructing conditionality: the bureaucratization of EC development aid. European Foreign Affairs Review, 2006, (11): 263–280.De Marcilly Ch., Garde A. The EU-Turkey agreement and its implications: an unavoidable but conditional agreement. Robert Schuman Foundation, European Issues, 13.06.2016, (396). Available at: https://www.robert-schuman.eu/en/europeanissues/0396-the-eu-turkey-agreement-and-its-implicationsan-unavoidable-but-conditional-agreement (accessed 10 Jan 2022).De Marcilly Ch., Garde A. The EU-Turkey agreement and its implications: an unavoidable but conditional agreement. Robert Schuman Foundation, European Issues, 13.06.2016, (396). Available at: https://www.robert-schuman.eu/en/europeanissues/0396-the-eu-turkey-agreement-and-its-implicationsan-unavoidable-but-conditional-agreement (accessed 10 Jan 2022).Игумнова Л. О. Европейские механизмы диффузии универсальных ценностей и международных норм. Вестник Иркутского государственного технического университета. 2012. № 1. С. 233–239.Igumnova L. O. European diffusion mechanisms of universal values and international norms. iPolytech Journal, 2012, (1): 233–239. (In Russ.)Gavin B. The EU-ACP economic partnership agreements: what impact on development? The Institute for International Integration Studies Discussion Paper Series, 2007, (224). Available at: https://www.tcd.ie/triss/assets/PDFs/iiis/iiisdp224.pdf (accessed 10 Jan 2022).Gavin B. The EU-ACP economic partnership agreements: what impact on development? The Institute for International Integration Studies Discussion Paper Series, 2007, (224). Available at: https://www.tcd.ie/triss/assets/PDFs/iiis/iiisdp224.pdf (accessed 10 Jan 2022).Carbone M. Between EU actorness and aid effectiveness: the logics of EU aid to sub-Saharan Africa. International Relations, 2013, 27(3): 341–355. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047117813497300Carbone M. Between EU actorness and aid effectiveness: the logics of EU aid to sub-Saharan Africa. International Relations, 2013, 27(3): 341–355. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047117813497300Kalantaryan S., McMahon S. Covid-19 and remittances in Africa. JRC Technical Report. EUR 30262 EN, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg, 2020. https://doi.org/10.2760/86710Kalantaryan S., McMahon S. Covid-19 and remittances in Africa. JRC Technical Report. EUR 30262 EN, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg, 2020. https://doi.org/10.2760/86710Kateb A. EU-Africa relations in the light of the Covid-19 pandemic. State of play and prospects. Robert Schuman Foundation, European Issues, 16.02.2021, (584). Available at: https://www.robert-schuman.eu/en/european-issues/0584-europe-africarelations-in-the-light-of-the-covid-19-pandemic-state-of-play-and-prospects (accessed 10 Jan 2022).Kateb A. EU-Africa relations in the light of the Covid-19 pandemic. State of play and prospects. Robert Schuman Foundation, European Issues, 16.02.2021, (584). Available at: https://www.robert-schuman.eu/en/european-issues/0584-europe-africarelations-in-the-light-of-the-covid-19-pandemic-state-of-play-and-prospects (accessed 10 Jan 2022).Bird L. Smuggling in the time of COVID-19: The impact of the pandemic on human-smuggling dynamics and migrantprotection risks. Global Initiative Against Transnational Organized Crime, 2020. 34 p.Bird L. Smuggling in the time of COVID-19: The impact of the pandemic on human-smuggling dynamics and migrantprotection risks. Global Initiative Against Transnational Organized Crime, 2020. 34 p.Maunganidze O. A., Abebe T. T. Implications of the COVID-19 pandemic for the Africa–EU partnership agenda on migration and mobility: a continental perspective. IAI Papers, 2020. Available at: https://www.iai.it/sites/default/files/iaip2043.pdf (accessed 10 Jan 2022).Maunganidze O. A., Abebe T. T. Implications of the COVID-19 pandemic for the Africa–EU partnership agenda on migration and mobility: a continental perspective. IAI Papers, 2020. Available at: https://www.iai.it/sites/default/files/iaip2043.pdf (accessed 10 Jan 2022).Матюхова Е. И. Миграционный вызов ЕС в условиях пандемии COVID-19: проявление солидарности или угроза сплоченности? Анализ и прогноз. Журнал ИМЭМО РАН. 2020. № 4. С. 94–107. https://doi.org/10.20542/afij-2020-4-94-107Matiukhova E. I. Migration challenges in the EU amid the COVID-19 pandemic: fostering solidarity or threatening the cohesion? Analysis and Forecasting. IMEMO Journal, 2020, (4): 94–107. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.20542/afij-2020-4-94-107Varga B. M. Access to healthcare services for the Roma and undocumented migrants in the EU in light of the COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Roma Studies, 2020, 2(2): 4–27. https://doi.org/10.17583/ijrs.2020.5952Varga B. M. Access to healthcare services for the Roma and undocumented migrants in the EU in light of the COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Roma Studies, 2020, 2(2): 4–27. https://doi.org/10.17583/ijrs.2020.5952

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.