References

kemsu

СибСкрипт

SibScript

2949-21222949-2092

Kemerovo State University

10.21603/2078-8975-2018-1-133-138

kemsu-2395

Research Article

Психология

Psychology

РЕЛЕВАНТНОСТЬ ПСИХОЛОГИЧЕСКОГО ПОРТРЕТА КАК ДЕТЕРМИНАНТА ЭФФЕКТА БАРНУМА

RELEVANCE OF INTERPRETATION AS THE DETERMINANT OF THE BARNUM EFFECT

Калита

В. В.

Kalita

V. V.

700200@mail.ru

Гайдай

А. С.

Gaidai

A. S.

Netparoley@gmail.com

Дальневосточный федеральный университетРоссияFar Eastern Federal UniversityRussian Federation

Морской государственный университет им. адмирала Г. И. НевельскогоРоссияAdmiral Nevelskoi Maritime State UniversityRussian Federation

2018

25042018

01133138

2018

Калита В.В., Гайдай А.С.

Kalita V.V., Gaidai A.S.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

https://www.sibscript.ru/jour/article/view/2395

В статье исследуется релевантность психологического портрета как фактор влияния на эффект Барнума. Приведены определения исследуемого явления, а также нескольких важных для данной работы понятий. Дан краткий обзор литературы по исследованию этой переменной. Испытуемыми выступили студенты очных форм обучения Дальневосточного федерального университета и Морского государственного университета им. адмирала Г. И. Невельского, которым предоставлялось тривиальное личностное описание для соотнесения со своей Я-концепцией. Исследование осуществлялось в соответствии со стандартной процедурой, применяющейся в эмпирических исследованиях эффекта Барнума. Обработка полученных данных осуществлялась при помощи статистического критерия Пирсона χ2 . По итогам проведенного исследования было обнаружено статистически значимое различие в оценке испытуемыми точности тривиального личностного описания в зависимости от типа релевантности, что уточняет наши представления об эффекте Барнума. В выводе обозначены дальнейшие пути исследования эффекта Барнума и использования полученных данных.

The current research features the relevance of the psychological portrait as a factor of influence on the Barnum effect. The article contains some definitions of the phenomenon in question, as well as some other relevant concepts. It offers a brief review of the literature on the matter. The subjects of the research were full-time students of the Far East Federal University and the Admiral Nevelskoy Maritime State University, who were offered to relate a trivial personal description to their self-concept. The study was carried out in accordance with the standard procedure used in empirical studies of the Barnum effect. The processing of the obtained data was carried out with the help of the Pearson statistical criterion χ2 . Based on the results of the study, a statistically significant difference in the assessment of the accuracy of the trivial personal description was found. The difference depends on the type of relevance, which clarifies the current understanding of the Barnum effect. The conclusion features some further ways of investigating the Barnum effect and using the obtained data.

эффект Барнумарелевантностьтривиальное личностное описаниедетерминантаЯ-концепция

Barnum effectrelevancetrivial personal interpretationdeterminantself-concept

References1

Forer B. R. The fallacy of personal validation: a classroom demonstration of gullibility // The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology. 1949. № 44. P. 118–123. DOI: 10.1037/h0059240.

Forer B. R. The fallacy of personal validation: a classroom demonstration of gullibility. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, no. 44 (1949): 118–123. DOI: 10.1037/h0059240.

Rosen G. M. Effects of source prestige on subjects’ acceptance of the Barnum effect: Psychologist versus astrologer // Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 1975. № 43. P. 95. DOI: 10.1037/h0076289.

Rosen G. M. Effects of source prestige on subjects’ acceptance of the Barnum effect: Psychologist versus astrologer. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, no. 43 (1975): 95. DOI: 10.1037/h0076289.

Mosher D. L. Approval Motive and Acceptance of "Fake" Personality Test Interpretations which Differ in Favorability // Psychological Reports. 1965. № 17(2). P. 395–402. DOI: 10.2466/pr0.1965.17.2.395.

Mosher D. L. Approval Motive and Acceptance of "Fake" Personality Test Interpretations which Differ in Favorability. Psychological Reports, no. 17 (1965): 395–402. DOI: 10.2466/pr0.1965.17.2.395.

Richards W. S., Merrens M. R. Student evaluation of generalized personality interpretations as a function of method of assessment // Journal of Clinical Psychology. 1971. № 27. P. 457–459. DOI: 10.1002/1097-4679(197110)27:43.0.co;2-i.

Richards W. S., Merrens M. R. Student evaluation of generalized personality interpretations as a function of method of assessment. Journal of Clinical Psychology, no. 27 (1971): 457–459. DOI: 10.1002/1097-4679 (197110)27:43.0.co;2-i.

Калита В. В., Гайдай А. С. Детерминанты эффекта Барнума: объективность характера тривиальных личностных описаний // Сибирский психологический журнал. 2014. № 54. С. 48–61.

Kalita V. V., Gaidai A. S. Determinanty effekta Barnuma: ob»ektivnost’ kharaktera trivial’nykh lichnostnykh opisanii [Determinants of the Barnum Effect: Objectivity of the Character of Trivial Personal Descriptions]. Sibirskii psikhologicheskii zhurnal = Siberian Psychological Journal, no. 54 (2014): 48–61.

Mason O. J., Budge K. Schizotypy, self-referential thinking and the Barnum effect // Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry. 2011. № 42. P. 145–148. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2010.11.003.

Mason O. J., Budge K. Schizotypy, self-referential thinking and the Barnum effect. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, no. 42(2) (2011): 145–148. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2010.11.003.

Rogers P., Soule J. Cross-Cultural Differences in the Acceptance of Barnum Profiles Supposedly Derived From Western Versus Chinese Astrology // Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology. 2009. № 40. P. 381–399. DOI: 10.1177/0022022109332843.

Rogers P., Soule J. Cross-Cultural Differences in the Acceptance of Barnum Proﬁles Supposedly Derived From Western Versus Chinese Astrology. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, no. 40 (2009): 381–399. DOI: 10.1177/0022022109332843.

Layne C. Gender and the Barnum Effect: A Reinterpretation of Piper-Terry and Downey’s Results // Psychological Reports. 1998. № 83. P. 608–610. DOI: 10.2466/pr0.1998.83.2.608.

Layne C. Gender and the Barnum Effect: A Reinterpretation of Piper-Terry and Downey’s Results. Psychological Reports, no. 83 (1998): 608–610. DOI:10.2466/pr0.1998.83.2.608.

Farley-Icard R. L. (2007). Factors that inﬂuence the Barnum Effect: Social desirability, base rates and personalization. (January 1, 2007). ETD Collection for University of Texas, El Paso. Paper AAI1444101.

Калита В. В., Гайдай А. С. Профессиональная направленность и тип описания как детерминанты эффекта Барнума // Вестник Кемеровского государственного университета. 2013. № 4-1. С. 113–117.

.Kalita V. V., Gaidai A. S. Professional’naia napravlennost’ i tip opisaniia kak determinanty effekta Barnuma [Professional orientation and type of description as determinants of the Barnum effect]. Bulletin of Kemerovo State University, no. 4-1 (2013): 113–117.

Гайдай А. С. Детерминанты эффекта Барнума // Сборник докладов 59-й Международной молодежной научно-технической конференции «Молодежь – наука – инновации» (21–23 марта 2012). Владивосток, 2012. Т. 2. С. 173–177.

.Gaidai A. S. Determinanty effekta Barnuma [Determinants of the Barnum effect]. Sbornik dokladov 59-i Mezhdunarodnoi molodezhnoi nauchno-tekhnicheskoi konferentsii «Molodezh’ – nauka – innovatsii» (21– 23 marta 2012) [«Youth – Science – Innovations»: Proc. 59th Intern. Youth Sc.-Prac. Conf. (March 21–23 2012)]. Vladivostok, vol. 2 (2012): 173–177.

Головин С. Ю. Словарь практического психолога. Минск: Харвест, 1998. 551 с.

Golovin S. Iu. Slovar’ prakticheskogo psikhologa [Dictionary of Practical Psychologist]. Minsk: Harvest, 1998, 551.

Corsini R. J., Craighead W. E., Weiner I. B. The Corsini encyclopedia of psychology: Vol. 1. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley, 2010.

Rosen G. M. Barnum Effect. The Encyclopedia of Clinical Psychology, 2015. 1–3. DOI: 10.1002/9781118625392. wbecp482.

Snyder C. R., Larson G. R. A further look at student acceptance of general personality interpretations // Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 1972. № 38. P. 384–388. DOI: 10.1037/h0032899.

Snyder C. R., Larson G. R. A further look at student acceptance of general personality interpretations. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, no. 38 (1972): 384–388. DOI: 10.1037/h0032899.

Snyder C. R. Acceptance of personality interpretations as a function of assessment procedures // Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 1974. № 42. P. 150. DOI: 10.1037/h0036033.

Snyder C. R. Acceptance of personality interpretations as a function of assessment procedures. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, no. 42 (1974): 150. DOI: 10.1037/h0036033.

Snyder C. R., Larsen D. L., Bloom L. J. Acceptance of general personality interpretations prior to and after receipt of diagnostic feedback supposedly based on psychological, graphological, and astrological assessment procedures // Journal of Clinical Psychology. 1976. № 32. P. 258–265. DOI: 10.1002/1097-4679(197604)32:23.0.co;2-o.

Snyder C. R., Larsen D. L., & Bloom L. J. (1976). Acceptance of general personality interpretations prior to and after receipt of diagnostic feedback supposedly based on psychological, grapholo gical, and astrological assessment procedures. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 32, 258–265. DOI:10.1002/1097-4679(197604)32:23.0.co;2-o.

Dickson D. H., Kelly I. W. The ‘Barnum Effect’ in Personality Assessment: A Review of the Literature // Psychological Reports. 1985. № 57. P. 367–382. DOI: 10.2466/pr0.1985.57.2.367.

Dickson D. H., & Kelly I. W. The ‘Barnum Effect’ in Personality Assessment: A Review of the Literature. Psychological Reports, no. 57 (1985): 367–382. DOI: 10.2466/pr0.1985.57.2.367.

Snyder C. R., Shenkel R. J. Effects of «favorability,» modality, and relevance on acceptance of general personality interpretations prior to and after receiving diagnostic feedback // Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 1976. № 44. P. 34–41. DOI: 10.1037//0022-006x.44.1.34.

Snyder C. R., Shenkel R. J. Effects of «favorability,» modality, and relevance on acceptance of general personality interpretations prior to and after receiving diagnostic feedback. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, no. 44 (1976): 34–41. DOI:10.1037//0022-006x.44.1.34.

Jackson D. E. The effect of test taking on acceptance of bogus personality statements // Journal of Clinical Psychology. 1978. № 34. P. 63–68. DOI: 10.1002/1097-4679(197801)34:13.0.co;2-x.

Jackson D. E. The effect of test taking on acceptance of bogus perosnality statements. Journal of Clinical Psychology, no. 34 (1978): 63–68. DOI: 10.1002/1097-4679(197801)34:13.0.co;2-x.

Baillargeon J., Danis C. Barnum Meets the Computer: A Critical Test // Journal of Personality Assessment. 1984. № 48. P. 415–419. DOI: 10.1207/s15327752jpa4804_15.

Baillargeon J., Danis C. Barnum Meets the Computer: A Critical Test. Journal of Personality Assessment, no. 48 (1984): 415–419. DOI: 10.1207/s15327752jpa4804_15.

Collins R. W., Dmitruk V. M., Ranney J. T. Personal validation: Some empirical and ethical considerations // Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 1977. № 45. P. 70–77. DOI: 10.1037//0022-006x.45.1.70.

Collins R. W., Dmitruk V. M., Ranney J. T. Personal validation: Some empirical and ethical considerations. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, no. 45 (1977): 70–77. doi:10.1037//0022-006x.45.1.70.

Высоков И. Е. Математические методы в психологии. Учебник и практикум для академического бакалавриата. М.: Юрайт, 2016. 388 с.

Vysokov I. E. Matematicheskie metody v psikhologii [Mathematical Methods in Psychology]. Moscow: Iurait, 2016, 388.

Ермолаев-Томин О. Ю. Математические методы в психологии. М.: Юрайт, 2016. 511 с.

Ermolaev-Tomin O. Iu. Matematicheskie metody v psikhologii [Mathematical Methods in Psychology]. Moscow: Iurait, 2016, 511.

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.